The blog title is especially appropriate this week. We have another gun and three more dogs in the house thanks to my son-in-law, Larry, arriving last night from Virginia. My daughter flew in last Thursday, but Larry's ship didn't get back to Norfolk until the next day, so he drove through the Blizzard of 2009 (as they dubbed it on the news) to get here. Why didn't she just wait and go with him the next day you ask? Katie came for my son's wedding which took place on Saturday. Now they are staying for Christmas, and we'll have six dogs and twelve people here for Christmas dinner.
I went out and dug nearly four gallons of dog poo out of the snow this morning, but I'm sure that was just the tip of the ice-turd, as I haven't been out to pick it up since we got a fairly large snow a couple of weeks ago. By the time the extra dogs go back home, I'm sure I'll have quite a load in the garbage barrel.
Monday, December 21, 2009
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Better Luck Next Year
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times...I got a decent shot at a deer, but I didn't get it. Deer season is minutes from being over for 2009. I had a half-way decent opportunity on opening day, but didn't execute satisfactorily. Four more trips seeking redemption produced nothing. The excitement provided by a chance to shoot at something other than paper with my Smith & Wesson 500 was worth the $28 for a deer permit, though. I'm sad that I missed my opportunity, but it saved me the hassle of field dressing and disposing of the meat. The wife wouldn't eat it, or cook it, so I probably would have donated it anyway.
I saw 6 other deer while armed and ready during the season, but none of them offered me a legal, or reasonable shot. Two does crossed from public hunting grounds to a private corn field only a few dozen yards away as I was driving yesterday. Three does attempted to cross in front of me from private land to public land this morning, but turned around and went back when they saw me coming down the highway. A nice buck showed me his bright white tail for a fleeting moment in the woods along a creek this morning, and that's the last I saw of him.
I'm not complaining, mind you, just relating the facts. I fully expect to get one (or two) next year, given the experience I gained this year.
I saw 6 other deer while armed and ready during the season, but none of them offered me a legal, or reasonable shot. Two does crossed from public hunting grounds to a private corn field only a few dozen yards away as I was driving yesterday. Three does attempted to cross in front of me from private land to public land this morning, but turned around and went back when they saw me coming down the highway. A nice buck showed me his bright white tail for a fleeting moment in the woods along a creek this morning, and that's the last I saw of him.
I'm not complaining, mind you, just relating the facts. I fully expect to get one (or two) next year, given the experience I gained this year.
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Slow Saturday
The NRA membership links are in place now on this blog as well as the EVC blog and the EVC home page, so all you faithful readers out there (Trevor) who aren't already members need to take advantage of the $10 savings now. Seriously, anyone who holds dear our second amendment rights should join, if for no other reason than to get a cool hat and window decal.
The Chief's blog was pretty interesting yesterday and got a lot of comments. Though most were positive, I figured there would be some people not too impressed by Tom's elation over catching someone who shoplifted a magazine.
Well, it's sort of crappy looking outside today. I suppose I'll get started on the SOP for the Ikes shooting range, at least for a while this morning.
The Chief's blog was pretty interesting yesterday and got a lot of comments. Though most were positive, I figured there would be some people not too impressed by Tom's elation over catching someone who shoplifted a magazine.
Well, it's sort of crappy looking outside today. I suppose I'll get started on the SOP for the Ikes shooting range, at least for a while this morning.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Trying to Help
It seems I'm becoming more active with every passing day in the gun enthusiasts arena. On Saturday, I took the NRA course and test to be a certified Range Safety Officer. With that certification, and approval of the Ike's board, I will be able to use the 300 yard range on my own, or act as the Range Officer so that others may use the range under my supervision. I have also volunteered to write a set of standard operating procedures for the Izaak Walton League rifle/pistol/shotgun/archery/air gun ranges and their various events and competitions. That will be a rather time-consuming effort, I'm sure, and will require the help and approval of various members, officers, and board members at the club. Still, I am anxious to get started on it.
I also just became an official recruiter for the NRA. I can offer people $10 of the regular membership price, which is no big deal because you can usually find a coupon or some other special offer if you look. However, I get a commission on each new member I sign up, so I could offer another $5 rebate (so to speak) in addition. I also found out there is a $10 membership (called an associate membership) which still gets you the free hat and insurance on your guns and life, but you don't get the magazine or voting privileges. Not only that, but I can get people a lifetime membership for $750 rather than the regular $1K. If I were not quite so old already, I'd defiinitely consider that myself.
I'm not doing much so far as the EVC for the first district, but there just isn't much going on politically right now as far as 2A issues or elections. I'm sure things will heat up as we near election time and the legislature begins a new session.
I also just became an official recruiter for the NRA. I can offer people $10 of the regular membership price, which is no big deal because you can usually find a coupon or some other special offer if you look. However, I get a commission on each new member I sign up, so I could offer another $5 rebate (so to speak) in addition. I also found out there is a $10 membership (called an associate membership) which still gets you the free hat and insurance on your guns and life, but you don't get the magazine or voting privileges. Not only that, but I can get people a lifetime membership for $750 rather than the regular $1K. If I were not quite so old already, I'd defiinitely consider that myself.
I'm not doing much so far as the EVC for the first district, but there just isn't much going on politically right now as far as 2A issues or elections. I'm sure things will heat up as we near election time and the legislature begins a new session.
Friday, September 4, 2009
Meet the Sniper
The good news is that my kills-per-shot ratio in dove hunting this year is 1 to 1. The bad news is that I only saw one bird in range for a shot on opening day. The dogs and i went out to Wagon Train Lake on Tuesday between 10 and 11 in the morning; not the ideal time, I know. We walked across the dam and then through the wooded area on the southwest corner of the property. Coming back across the dam, I noticed a pair of doves fly down to the water's edge way up ahead of us. I watched, hoping they'd hang around until we got close enough for a shot, but they took off and landed again somewhere near the other end of the dam. They never appeared again, so we loaded up and drove to the far end of the property where there was some heavily wooded ground next to an open field of tall weeds (mostly fox tail, I think). We wound our way through the woods, but it was thick with spider webs. I'm not worried about spiders or anything, but I hate the way the damn webs stick to your face and clothing and such. So, we worked our way out into the field and headed back toward the truck. Presently, I spotted a dove drop down out of one of the trees and head across the field about 40 yds. out. I had no trouble putting the front sight on it since I got the new bright green fiber-optic job from Cabela's a week or so ago. Its mate left the tree just a little behind but dropped too low for me to get a shot at it until it was out of range.
I kept my eye on the area the first dove dropped but didn't really expect to find it in the thick growth. I could hardly see the ground and had no idea where the dogs were except when they came close enough for me to hear them. I stopped about where I thought the dove came down and saw the weeds moving around just a few feet away. I found Sienna there wagging her tail and eyeballing the dead bird just inches from her nose. God, I love dogs! I let the other two sniff it when they finally figured out where we were. Mocha didn't care much, but Murphy wanted to bite its head off. It's probably not a wise thing to do, but I fried the little critter up and fed it to the dogs once we got home (one small bite each with Sienna getting the lion's share since she found it). Then, I spent about an hour cleaning the weed seeds from the dogs coats and my sneakers.
Wednesday, my son and i went out to Pawnee Lake to practice on some clay pigeons. I should stick to doves. We didn't actually count, but I'd guess we hit somewhere between half and two thirds of our attempts. My cheek is still a bit sore, but my shoulder held up surprisingly well.
The Saltdogs won the second home playoff game after getting their butts kicked in the first one by the Wichita Wingnuts. I have to wonder if they have a factory there that makes wingnuts, or if they just chose that name for the consonance effect. I guess it's no worse than making up something like Saltdogs. The third game is tonight at 7 pm in Wichita. Go Dogs!
I kept my eye on the area the first dove dropped but didn't really expect to find it in the thick growth. I could hardly see the ground and had no idea where the dogs were except when they came close enough for me to hear them. I stopped about where I thought the dove came down and saw the weeds moving around just a few feet away. I found Sienna there wagging her tail and eyeballing the dead bird just inches from her nose. God, I love dogs! I let the other two sniff it when they finally figured out where we were. Mocha didn't care much, but Murphy wanted to bite its head off. It's probably not a wise thing to do, but I fried the little critter up and fed it to the dogs once we got home (one small bite each with Sienna getting the lion's share since she found it). Then, I spent about an hour cleaning the weed seeds from the dogs coats and my sneakers.
Wednesday, my son and i went out to Pawnee Lake to practice on some clay pigeons. I should stick to doves. We didn't actually count, but I'd guess we hit somewhere between half and two thirds of our attempts. My cheek is still a bit sore, but my shoulder held up surprisingly well.
The Saltdogs won the second home playoff game after getting their butts kicked in the first one by the Wichita Wingnuts. I have to wonder if they have a factory there that makes wingnuts, or if they just chose that name for the consonance effect. I guess it's no worse than making up something like Saltdogs. The third game is tonight at 7 pm in Wichita. Go Dogs!
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Lions and Tigers and Theirs (Oh my!)
The poll on the left is the first one I've tried one on this blog. I see that I have a mistake in the question (using "their" instead of "there"), but I cannot edit it once someone has voted. I thought about removing it, especially since I voted twice, but someone would probably be upset and say I took it down because it wasn't showing what I wanted to see. Actually, I'm surprised to see there were any more votes on it. Probably some NFOA members, which is fine, but I have no way of knowing. The final result won't prove anything anyway, except the feelings of those who have come to my blog (if even that).
I'm thinking I'll take the dogs out for an opening day dove hunt. I'll have to go in the middle of the day, since I slept in and I'm going to the Saltdogs game tonight. I'll miss the best two times of the day, but maybe I'll still see a dove or two and be able to try out my new fiber-optic sight.
I'm thinking I'll take the dogs out for an opening day dove hunt. I'll have to go in the middle of the day, since I slept in and I'm going to the Saltdogs game tonight. I'll miss the best two times of the day, but maybe I'll still see a dove or two and be able to try out my new fiber-optic sight.
Monday, August 31, 2009
Me and Dennis Leary
I guess, if the shoe fits, I've got to wear it. Then again, if doing what I do makes me an a**hole, then I'm proud to be one, just like Dennis is. The NFOA members didn't heed the warning from their so-called webmaster and continued their personal attacks on me so I posted my last comment last night and bid them adeu. Then, the webmaster emailed me to let me know I was banned from their forum (sort of like firing someone after they quit). He actually came here to my blog and copied one of the responses to a comment that he claimed was a personal attack on all NFOA members. Of course, he didn't bother to post the body of my blog for that day, which would have explained, and perhaps mitigated the comment, for those who only saw what he copied and pasted on their forum.
Someone else there accused me of not posting his comments to my blog in order to make me out a hypocrite (I guess) for expecting to be allowed to post dissenting opinions on their forum, and not allowing them on mine. However, he must not have known how to make a comment here and done something wrong, as I (the moderator) never was notified of a pending comment.
I suppose some of them have read my blog here and taken offense at some of the things I said, even though I never named any names when I characterized some in the association as people who might put gun owners and 2A supporters in a bad light to the public in general. I guess if the shoe fits, they must wear it, too.
I would welcome debate on most any issue. Many of them claimed to enjoy a good debate, too. However, rather than bring up counter points and arguments of their own, many of them resort to ridicule and harassment. If any of them want to come here and make a civil comment that is aimed at supporting a contrary opinion rather than simply bashing those they don't agree with, I'd be happy to post them.
There are a number of NFOA members who are willing to debate the issues, and know how to do it properly. I don't mean to characterize the entire organization poorly. As with many types of public forums, those who speak the loudest and most often are usually at the extremes, or those who want change rather than the status quo. Therefore, they don't truly represent the whole very well. My apologies to any NFOA members who have not displayed the rude behaviors and intollerance I have ascribed to some in the group.
I see someone voted on my poll for the no restrictions option; most likely one of the NFOA members since Trevor is about the only other person reading this stuff. Not that I could say what his vote might be, but he would probably also make a comment supporting his stand. I must admit that I voted a second time, just to see if the "poll gadget" I added would allow it. Apparently, it does not allow multiple votes from the same computer, but probably has no way of knowing if the same person votes from different computers (which I did). So the results are skewed, but I'm thinking it's not going to mean much anyway with only two voters so far.
I'd really like to have the ability to conduct some polls where the results had real meaning. There are often questions that come up where I suspect how most people feel, but it is only my suspicion (which could be entirely wrong). I would really like to know how people feel about many issues, and there aren't always scientifically designed polls out on the subjects that concern me. I think I could write the proper questions so as not to bias the poll, but I need a way to get a truly random, or otherwise appropriate sample to survey.
Someone else there accused me of not posting his comments to my blog in order to make me out a hypocrite (I guess) for expecting to be allowed to post dissenting opinions on their forum, and not allowing them on mine. However, he must not have known how to make a comment here and done something wrong, as I (the moderator) never was notified of a pending comment.
I suppose some of them have read my blog here and taken offense at some of the things I said, even though I never named any names when I characterized some in the association as people who might put gun owners and 2A supporters in a bad light to the public in general. I guess if the shoe fits, they must wear it, too.
I would welcome debate on most any issue. Many of them claimed to enjoy a good debate, too. However, rather than bring up counter points and arguments of their own, many of them resort to ridicule and harassment. If any of them want to come here and make a civil comment that is aimed at supporting a contrary opinion rather than simply bashing those they don't agree with, I'd be happy to post them.
There are a number of NFOA members who are willing to debate the issues, and know how to do it properly. I don't mean to characterize the entire organization poorly. As with many types of public forums, those who speak the loudest and most often are usually at the extremes, or those who want change rather than the status quo. Therefore, they don't truly represent the whole very well. My apologies to any NFOA members who have not displayed the rude behaviors and intollerance I have ascribed to some in the group.
I see someone voted on my poll for the no restrictions option; most likely one of the NFOA members since Trevor is about the only other person reading this stuff. Not that I could say what his vote might be, but he would probably also make a comment supporting his stand. I must admit that I voted a second time, just to see if the "poll gadget" I added would allow it. Apparently, it does not allow multiple votes from the same computer, but probably has no way of knowing if the same person votes from different computers (which I did). So the results are skewed, but I'm thinking it's not going to mean much anyway with only two voters so far.
I'd really like to have the ability to conduct some polls where the results had real meaning. There are often questions that come up where I suspect how most people feel, but it is only my suspicion (which could be entirely wrong). I would really like to know how people feel about many issues, and there aren't always scientifically designed polls out on the subjects that concern me. I think I could write the proper questions so as not to bias the poll, but I need a way to get a truly random, or otherwise appropriate sample to survey.
Saturday, August 29, 2009
The Roller Coaster
Things haven't gone so well recently in my relationship with the NFOA. Having met and shaken hands with some members at Cabela's last week, I thought our minor disagreements on the forum were history, and we could move on with promoting our 2A cause. That was apparently not the case. It seems certain individuals are just looking for something in my comments they can criticize. One post had to do with a newer member having gotten a CHP and wondering what type of gun would make for a good carry weapon. Numerous members posted information and pics of their favorite guns. One of the first ones pictured was a 1911-style 45 semi-auto that was nearly identical in size and shape to my Kimber. In fact, most all full size 1911s are nearly identical; certainly not different enough one could tell the differences through clothing. A number of others also posted pics or described 1911s as a good gun to carry. However, when I posted a pic of my Kimber, an immediate response was that it was far too big and bulky with sharp edges and a huge front sight that would make it a poor choice for concealed carry.
Another topic was quotes to live by. A number of people posted their favorite quotes from noted historic figures like Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Samuel Adams, Kennedy, Einstein, and others. It was like reading a history book, and somewhat boring. For a little humor, I posted "If it feels good, do it" - Unknown Author. The next comment criticized the quote and related it to doing heroin or something, and that was followed by another who agreed he hated the quote. When I responded that I was just trying to lighten the mood, I got "blah, blah, blah" from the next commenter.
There are many more examples, but the point is I was getting tired of being targeted and having negative comments directed at me personally. I had not, to that point criticized any individual in the group, and stuck to debating issues. I made my feelings clear and am now waiting to see how the group reacts. I'd like to think there were enough rational members who would support my right to disagree with other members and put a stop to the personal attacks by anyone. However, I am prepared to separate myself from the association if that fails to happen. I have already taken the link to their web site off my blog, as I cannont in good faith recommend anyone join the group given the current situation. We'll see how it all pans out soon, I'm sure.
On another front, I'm still waiting for some information and materials from the NRA regarding the EVC position I accepted. I am now listed as the EVC on the NRA-ILA web site, and I've even gotten one email from someone hoping to get some interest by the NRA in local gun issues here in Lincoln and Nebraska. This endeavor may turn out to be a bust, too, if my NRA contact doesn't follow through like I would have hoped. I'm not going to continue in this capacity very long if I have no support from those I am trying to help.
The good news is I'm off from work until the day after Labor Day! I'm seriously thinking about doing some camping. I'm just not sure where a good place for primitive camping with three dogs would be. I want access to the water (might do some fishing) so the dogs can swim and practice retrieving, but I also would like some trees for shade and some nice paths to hike. Some hilly country would be nice, and some small game like rabbits and squirrels would make it ideal. Anyone have an idea?
Another topic was quotes to live by. A number of people posted their favorite quotes from noted historic figures like Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Samuel Adams, Kennedy, Einstein, and others. It was like reading a history book, and somewhat boring. For a little humor, I posted "If it feels good, do it" - Unknown Author. The next comment criticized the quote and related it to doing heroin or something, and that was followed by another who agreed he hated the quote. When I responded that I was just trying to lighten the mood, I got "blah, blah, blah" from the next commenter.
There are many more examples, but the point is I was getting tired of being targeted and having negative comments directed at me personally. I had not, to that point criticized any individual in the group, and stuck to debating issues. I made my feelings clear and am now waiting to see how the group reacts. I'd like to think there were enough rational members who would support my right to disagree with other members and put a stop to the personal attacks by anyone. However, I am prepared to separate myself from the association if that fails to happen. I have already taken the link to their web site off my blog, as I cannont in good faith recommend anyone join the group given the current situation. We'll see how it all pans out soon, I'm sure.
On another front, I'm still waiting for some information and materials from the NRA regarding the EVC position I accepted. I am now listed as the EVC on the NRA-ILA web site, and I've even gotten one email from someone hoping to get some interest by the NRA in local gun issues here in Lincoln and Nebraska. This endeavor may turn out to be a bust, too, if my NRA contact doesn't follow through like I would have hoped. I'm not going to continue in this capacity very long if I have no support from those I am trying to help.
The good news is I'm off from work until the day after Labor Day! I'm seriously thinking about doing some camping. I'm just not sure where a good place for primitive camping with three dogs would be. I want access to the water (might do some fishing) so the dogs can swim and practice retrieving, but I also would like some trees for shade and some nice paths to hike. Some hilly country would be nice, and some small game like rabbits and squirrels would make it ideal. Anyone have an idea?
Saturday, August 22, 2009
GOING POLITICAL
The Saltdogs are four games up on second place St. Paul in the northern division of the American Association, and I'm going to tonight's game where they could make it a five game lead by beating them again like they did last night. Go dogs! I hope they can hold on and get into the playoffs this year so I get to see some more games.
I'm beginning to get ready for the upcoming hunting season. Today, I went to Cabela's open house at the La Vista store. Man, was it crowded. I met four NFOA members who were manning a table there to try and get more people to join our ranks. The four I met were probably the four most vocal in their criticism of my comments, but they were all friendly, even after they found out who I was! :) Looked like they had maybe a hundred or so signed up already before noon. With a day and a half to go, they could add several hundred to the group.
Soon, I'll be starting a new endeavor that should keep me pretty busy. I hope not too busy, though. I've taken on the position of Election Volunteer Coordinator for the NRA in the first congressional district of Nebraska. I'm not too sure what all I'll be doing, and I think it is somewhat up to me how I go about the job and how involved I want to get. It may turn out to be little or nothing. Apparently, the EVC positions for all three districts in Nebraska have been vacant for some time. Someone did recently take on the post in the third district, and I have been in contact with him to get some info about it. He couldn't tell me much, as he hadn't really gotten started yet either, but he was cooperative and looks forward to working with me. We hope to find someone to fill the second district spot, too, in order to be as effective as possible in getting gun-friendly candidates elected over the entire state. I'm assuming we will also be promoting gun-friendly legislation, too. I'm hoping we can help get a Castle Law going here next year.
Well, I need to wrap this up. Just got news from the doctor that my mother-in-law had some bad readings on the heart monitor she was wearing the last few days and needs to go in for some tests. I need to go get her dog, Lulu, and bring her here, as Marge may have to stay in the hospital tonight. :(
I'm beginning to get ready for the upcoming hunting season. Today, I went to Cabela's open house at the La Vista store. Man, was it crowded. I met four NFOA members who were manning a table there to try and get more people to join our ranks. The four I met were probably the four most vocal in their criticism of my comments, but they were all friendly, even after they found out who I was! :) Looked like they had maybe a hundred or so signed up already before noon. With a day and a half to go, they could add several hundred to the group.
Soon, I'll be starting a new endeavor that should keep me pretty busy. I hope not too busy, though. I've taken on the position of Election Volunteer Coordinator for the NRA in the first congressional district of Nebraska. I'm not too sure what all I'll be doing, and I think it is somewhat up to me how I go about the job and how involved I want to get. It may turn out to be little or nothing. Apparently, the EVC positions for all three districts in Nebraska have been vacant for some time. Someone did recently take on the post in the third district, and I have been in contact with him to get some info about it. He couldn't tell me much, as he hadn't really gotten started yet either, but he was cooperative and looks forward to working with me. We hope to find someone to fill the second district spot, too, in order to be as effective as possible in getting gun-friendly candidates elected over the entire state. I'm assuming we will also be promoting gun-friendly legislation, too. I'm hoping we can help get a Castle Law going here next year.
Well, I need to wrap this up. Just got news from the doctor that my mother-in-law had some bad readings on the heart monitor she was wearing the last few days and needs to go in for some tests. I need to go get her dog, Lulu, and bring her here, as Marge may have to stay in the hospital tonight. :(
Saturday, August 15, 2009
17HMR x 2
I bought a Savage .17 HMR about a month ago. From the git go, I wasn't too thrilled about the fit of the magazine into the gun. It seemed loose, yet it didn't slide in or out very well, and it didn't "snap" into place like I thought it should. Most of the time, I had to put upward pressure on the bottom of the magazine while I shoved the bolt forward in order for the first round to chamber correctly. After that, the others seemed okay, at first. I fired about 50 rounds through it (ten mags full) while getting the scope adjusted (first at 25 yds, then at 50).
I decided if I was going to keep it, I would want a couple more mags anyway, and I thought maybe the magazine was the problem rather than the rifle, so I ordered a couple more. They came a while back, and I went out to try again. Same problem, same fit, with all three mags. The problem seemed to get worse the more I shot and loaded it. Eventually, I couldn't even get a round to load without forcing the bolt forward with undue pressure. Then, the spent round wouldn't eject, and I had to pick it out with a screw driver.
I decided I was going to return the gun to Scheel's, but I didn't know what they would say about it or be willing to do for me. I wasn't sure how long I'd had the gun or what their policy was on returns. I didn't have the paperwork with me or the box or lock or other stuff, but I didn't want to drive all the way home to get it not knowing if they'd take it back anyway. So, I decided to just stop on the way home and explain the problem and see what they would say.
They were happy to exchange my gun for a brand new one, no questions asked, no receipt, packaging or anything. I brought the new gun home, cleaned it, and took it out this morning. First thing I did was to simply insert and empty mag to see how it felt. I seemed better, but still not what I would have liked. However, it seemed the same problem was returning as each round seemed harder to chamber and each clip seemed harder to insert fully. I finally managed to get a magazine in that seemed to "fit" and all the rounds chambered and fired and ejected as they should have. After that, everything seemed to work as I would have expected it to in the first place. I still don't know for sure what the problem was, but hopefully it has passed and won't return.
In the mean time, I got it sighted in and it did quite well. At 50 yds I could put five rounds into a less than one inch group. At 25 yds, about a 5/8" group. It remains to be seen how it will perform next time I go out to the range.
I decided if I was going to keep it, I would want a couple more mags anyway, and I thought maybe the magazine was the problem rather than the rifle, so I ordered a couple more. They came a while back, and I went out to try again. Same problem, same fit, with all three mags. The problem seemed to get worse the more I shot and loaded it. Eventually, I couldn't even get a round to load without forcing the bolt forward with undue pressure. Then, the spent round wouldn't eject, and I had to pick it out with a screw driver.
I decided I was going to return the gun to Scheel's, but I didn't know what they would say about it or be willing to do for me. I wasn't sure how long I'd had the gun or what their policy was on returns. I didn't have the paperwork with me or the box or lock or other stuff, but I didn't want to drive all the way home to get it not knowing if they'd take it back anyway. So, I decided to just stop on the way home and explain the problem and see what they would say.
They were happy to exchange my gun for a brand new one, no questions asked, no receipt, packaging or anything. I brought the new gun home, cleaned it, and took it out this morning. First thing I did was to simply insert and empty mag to see how it felt. I seemed better, but still not what I would have liked. However, it seemed the same problem was returning as each round seemed harder to chamber and each clip seemed harder to insert fully. I finally managed to get a magazine in that seemed to "fit" and all the rounds chambered and fired and ejected as they should have. After that, everything seemed to work as I would have expected it to in the first place. I still don't know for sure what the problem was, but hopefully it has passed and won't return.
In the mean time, I got it sighted in and it did quite well. At 50 yds I could put five rounds into a less than one inch group. At 25 yds, about a 5/8" group. It remains to be seen how it will perform next time I go out to the range.
Friday, August 14, 2009
Blog Blues
I went to see "Julie and Julia" last night with my wife. I know, it's a chick flick, but I hoped there would be a clip of Dan Akroyd doing his Julia Child skit from SNL. I wasn't disappointed; they ran almost the whole thing. Meryl did a great job as Julia. In case you don't know about it, the Julie character started a blog about cooking her way through Julia Child's cookbook. Julie wanted to be a writer, and she loved good food, so the combination was ideal. I was jealous when she started getting comments from readers to her blog (the thing I imagine all bloggers hope for). I haven't had many here, and the few I have had came to read this out of curiosity about me after reading my comments on other blogs (at least, I assume so).
My point is, don't be afraid to comment when you read a blog or go on a forum. Comments are exactly what the bloggers and commenters want to see. Good or bad, they live for comments.
I think my own blogging is partly a way to get things straight in my own mind. I feel a certain way about something, so I write about it. In the process, I sometimes discover the reason why I feel the way I do. Or, I realize that I have mixed feelings on an issue. Or, that I don't really know how I feel. Comments can help by getting others' perspectives.
I don't follow any blogs regularly outside of the Chief's Corner, but I have stumbled across some (perhaps the same way my commenters stumbled upon mine) that were really interesting or really funny. Most of them blog every day, something I could do, and probably would do, if I thought anyone was reading it. In the absence of readers, I need an issue, something that is bothering me, to give me an incentive to write. Actually, the incentive today was that the NFOA forum site is down for some reason, and I have developed a need to write somewhere.
Maybe I should try to be more funny. I think I could write a funny blog. At least it would be funny to me. Sometimes I get to laughing so hard at my own funny thoughts, I can hardly make my fingers work on the keyboard.
This hasn't been one of my best efforts. I better stop.
My point is, don't be afraid to comment when you read a blog or go on a forum. Comments are exactly what the bloggers and commenters want to see. Good or bad, they live for comments.
I think my own blogging is partly a way to get things straight in my own mind. I feel a certain way about something, so I write about it. In the process, I sometimes discover the reason why I feel the way I do. Or, I realize that I have mixed feelings on an issue. Or, that I don't really know how I feel. Comments can help by getting others' perspectives.
I don't follow any blogs regularly outside of the Chief's Corner, but I have stumbled across some (perhaps the same way my commenters stumbled upon mine) that were really interesting or really funny. Most of them blog every day, something I could do, and probably would do, if I thought anyone was reading it. In the absence of readers, I need an issue, something that is bothering me, to give me an incentive to write. Actually, the incentive today was that the NFOA forum site is down for some reason, and I have developed a need to write somewhere.
Maybe I should try to be more funny. I think I could write a funny blog. At least it would be funny to me. Sometimes I get to laughing so hard at my own funny thoughts, I can hardly make my fingers work on the keyboard.
This hasn't been one of my best efforts. I better stop.
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Hi Ho, Hi Ho
It's off to work, I go. Yesterday, the doctor cleared me to return to work with no restrictions. That's easy for him to say. He doesn't have the pain, stiffness, and swelling that keeps me from making a fist or even reaching into my jeans pocket. But, as bored as I've been the last couple of weeks, I'm ready to give it a go. Trouble is, from what I've heard, there is very little work to be done out at the plant right now. I talked to my lead man out there yesterday, though, and he said they'd find something for me to do. It's going to be hard getting up at five a.m. again when I've gotten so used to climbing out of bed at eight.
I suppose I won't be posting on the Chief's Corner or the NFOA forum nearly so much now. That will probably make a lot of people happy. I'm not terribly well liked by some of the most vocal NFOA members. While they don't take kindly to some of my comments and often accuse me of siding with the anti-gun crowd, I realize they are on the tail end of the bell curve and probably aren't representitive of the majority of the group. I hope that's the case, anyway. I have to keep reminding myself that on any kind of issue, it is usually those on the two extremes who are the most active and vocal. Given that this is a gun-owners group, it makes sense that everyone in it supports the second amendment. So, it follows that the most vocal in the group would be those who oppose any and all restrictions or infringements on it. I hope, the majority of them, while still supporting 2A, are sensible enough to realize we are going to have to accept some limitations.
Most of those who claim "no compromise" as their motto are hypocritical about it anyway. They still cow down to the authorities and purchase their permits and licenses and register their guns and try to follow the current laws so they don't lose their guns or have to pay fines or go to jail. If they were true to their word, and believed 100% in their inalienable right to bear arms, they would ignore any infringements on their rights and literally stick to their guns (subsequently having their cold, dead fingers pried from their triggers).
In the future, I won't bother responding to the criticisms and accusations of those (hopefully) few individuals who hold their heads high while falsely claiming their superiority over the sheep.
I suppose I won't be posting on the Chief's Corner or the NFOA forum nearly so much now. That will probably make a lot of people happy. I'm not terribly well liked by some of the most vocal NFOA members. While they don't take kindly to some of my comments and often accuse me of siding with the anti-gun crowd, I realize they are on the tail end of the bell curve and probably aren't representitive of the majority of the group. I hope that's the case, anyway. I have to keep reminding myself that on any kind of issue, it is usually those on the two extremes who are the most active and vocal. Given that this is a gun-owners group, it makes sense that everyone in it supports the second amendment. So, it follows that the most vocal in the group would be those who oppose any and all restrictions or infringements on it. I hope, the majority of them, while still supporting 2A, are sensible enough to realize we are going to have to accept some limitations.
Most of those who claim "no compromise" as their motto are hypocritical about it anyway. They still cow down to the authorities and purchase their permits and licenses and register their guns and try to follow the current laws so they don't lose their guns or have to pay fines or go to jail. If they were true to their word, and believed 100% in their inalienable right to bear arms, they would ignore any infringements on their rights and literally stick to their guns (subsequently having their cold, dead fingers pried from their triggers).
In the future, I won't bother responding to the criticisms and accusations of those (hopefully) few individuals who hold their heads high while falsely claiming their superiority over the sheep.
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Revelations
Even though I was expecting some critical comments to my input on NFOA, I was bit surprised by some of the impressions I created in some readers. I think everyone who has commented so far has, at least, welcomed my input and participation even if they didn't agree with my perspective. The most surprising thing was that some felt I was being, shall we say uppity, in my comments regarding poor spelling, grammar, or use of logic in others' writings. I certainly didn't intend any personal attacks, or even that people in general are less important or deserving of expressing their opinions simply because they weren't Enlish or logic majors. My point was simply that in order to most effectively further their cause (in this case, securing our second amendment rights), good grammar and logic would be of value. For anyone who was offended by my comments in this regard, I offer my apology (more than Obama has done for his perceived verbal slap in the face to the police in Cambridge).
I also admitted that, as hard as I try, I too have an occasional typo, misspelling, improper grammar, or misuse of a word. I hope that helps to clear up any misconceptions I may have created. I do realize that I am a bit egotistical, competitive, often obsessed with perfection (both in my own efforts and those of others), and a little stubborn. There are probably lots of other adjectives for my personal traits that are less than flattering. I often consider myself a moderate extremist with an obsessive compulsive (and yes addictive) personality. Some of those terms may not seem to go together, so let me explain.
I usually find myself, after a great deal of thought and self-examination, taking a path that is somewhat middle-of-the-road, in terms of political or ethical issues. Though I can understand the perspectives of those on the extremes, I don't often find that I agree totally with either of them. (Therefore the moderate label.) On the other hand, in my personal life, I find myself going to extremes quite often. I don't eat breakfast or lunch because once I start eating, it seems I never want to stop until I'm stuffed. I can go all day, or even longer without food and not give it a second thought, but once the food hits the palate, I'm not stopping until I'm really full or I get too tired to keep my jaws moving. That's just one example. When I start a job, I don't like to stop until it is completed. If I can't afford to buy every conceivable thing I might need in pursuit of a new interest (hobby) I'll often decide not to do it at all. And the list goes on. I'll go over my efforts at writing, edit them, read them again, do some more editing, delete half of it and start over, and continue this process until I'm absolutely certain that I've made my point as well as I can and that there are no mistakes in it. (Unfortuneatly, it often doesn't work.) That's the curse of being a perfectionist: you're never happy with anything you've done, and if you know you can't do it well enough to meet your own standards, you often just don't do it. I like to think I have a great deal of will power. I did stop smoking "cold turkey" some 30 years ago having smoked for nearly 15 years and going through two and a half packs a day toward the end of that time. Still, there are a number of things I would really like to stop, but I can't seem to work up the conviction to do it. I drink several beers a day, and I can't settle for the cheap stuff, I have the have the micro-brews that cost usually well over a dollar a bottle. I absolutely hate the idea of spending so much money on beer (which only makes me want to take a nap and adds to my difficulties in keeping my weight in check). Still, I love the taste, and it has become a habit that I'm sure won't go away unless I can find something with which to replace it. I'm not sure if I'm addicted or just excessive-compulsive about it. I've tried just having one or two a day, but it seldom works. I usually end up having four (or more). I can, and have, quit drinking beer all together for as much as two or three weeks at a time, several times, so I know I can do it. I guess I have to have something as my "crutch" or my "indulgence" and I haven't found anything better (or cheaper, or with fewer calories) yet. And, I've begun to recognize other obsessive-compulsive behaviors that continue even though there is no real benefit or logic to them (simple little things, like the way I floss my teeth, or weighing myself every morning without fail).
Yes, I've got some weirdness just like everybody else. My point in bringing all this up is to let people know that I'm aware of my imperfections, and that I don't consider myself "better" than others. I know we each have our own abilities and limitations and philosophies and codes of conduct. Most of us believe, or would like to, that our own concept of how the world should be is the right one. We act according to our beliefs. But, even though we may believe our way is the right way, a truly intelligent person realizes that everyone (even those who are "different" from them) has just as much right to their belief. This is probably the cause of most of the conflict in the world: human nature forces us to act on our own beliefs regardless of what others may think.
I also admitted that, as hard as I try, I too have an occasional typo, misspelling, improper grammar, or misuse of a word. I hope that helps to clear up any misconceptions I may have created. I do realize that I am a bit egotistical, competitive, often obsessed with perfection (both in my own efforts and those of others), and a little stubborn. There are probably lots of other adjectives for my personal traits that are less than flattering. I often consider myself a moderate extremist with an obsessive compulsive (and yes addictive) personality. Some of those terms may not seem to go together, so let me explain.
I usually find myself, after a great deal of thought and self-examination, taking a path that is somewhat middle-of-the-road, in terms of political or ethical issues. Though I can understand the perspectives of those on the extremes, I don't often find that I agree totally with either of them. (Therefore the moderate label.) On the other hand, in my personal life, I find myself going to extremes quite often. I don't eat breakfast or lunch because once I start eating, it seems I never want to stop until I'm stuffed. I can go all day, or even longer without food and not give it a second thought, but once the food hits the palate, I'm not stopping until I'm really full or I get too tired to keep my jaws moving. That's just one example. When I start a job, I don't like to stop until it is completed. If I can't afford to buy every conceivable thing I might need in pursuit of a new interest (hobby) I'll often decide not to do it at all. And the list goes on. I'll go over my efforts at writing, edit them, read them again, do some more editing, delete half of it and start over, and continue this process until I'm absolutely certain that I've made my point as well as I can and that there are no mistakes in it. (Unfortuneatly, it often doesn't work.) That's the curse of being a perfectionist: you're never happy with anything you've done, and if you know you can't do it well enough to meet your own standards, you often just don't do it. I like to think I have a great deal of will power. I did stop smoking "cold turkey" some 30 years ago having smoked for nearly 15 years and going through two and a half packs a day toward the end of that time. Still, there are a number of things I would really like to stop, but I can't seem to work up the conviction to do it. I drink several beers a day, and I can't settle for the cheap stuff, I have the have the micro-brews that cost usually well over a dollar a bottle. I absolutely hate the idea of spending so much money on beer (which only makes me want to take a nap and adds to my difficulties in keeping my weight in check). Still, I love the taste, and it has become a habit that I'm sure won't go away unless I can find something with which to replace it. I'm not sure if I'm addicted or just excessive-compulsive about it. I've tried just having one or two a day, but it seldom works. I usually end up having four (or more). I can, and have, quit drinking beer all together for as much as two or three weeks at a time, several times, so I know I can do it. I guess I have to have something as my "crutch" or my "indulgence" and I haven't found anything better (or cheaper, or with fewer calories) yet. And, I've begun to recognize other obsessive-compulsive behaviors that continue even though there is no real benefit or logic to them (simple little things, like the way I floss my teeth, or weighing myself every morning without fail).
Yes, I've got some weirdness just like everybody else. My point in bringing all this up is to let people know that I'm aware of my imperfections, and that I don't consider myself "better" than others. I know we each have our own abilities and limitations and philosophies and codes of conduct. Most of us believe, or would like to, that our own concept of how the world should be is the right one. We act according to our beliefs. But, even though we may believe our way is the right way, a truly intelligent person realizes that everyone (even those who are "different" from them) has just as much right to their belief. This is probably the cause of most of the conflict in the world: human nature forces us to act on our own beliefs regardless of what others may think.
Friday, July 24, 2009
Survived the Onslaught
Well, the initial blast of criticism may be over now. No one got too antagonistic over my letter to the NFOA membership, though several were dismayed that I would encourage anyone to even consider compromising when it comes to gun control legislation. I totally understand their belief in uninfringed second amendment rights. I just don't think it's realistic to think we will ever be free to possess and carry any kind of gun, anywhere, any time, and in any manner we wish. If I were to bet on that versus our guns being totally taken away from us, I'd reluctantly put my money on the latter (though I wouldn't give mine up without a hell of a fight ... a legal battle probably, but it would depend on the situation). I put much more stock in reacquiring our rights a little bit at a time (as we have been doing for a while now), proving as we go that gun rights for law abiding citizens will not result in more crime or accidental shootings, and hopefully that there will be a negative correlation to both.
I don't know if I'll keep up with regular posting here, or on the NFOA site, once I go back to work. I would probably be more inclined to keep up with the Chief's Corner with whatever time I have to spend. Then again, I don't know what's going to happen when (if) I get back to work. I sure couldn't do my entire job without considerable help the way things are with my wrist right now.
It's a bit warm today compared to what it has been lately. I don't know if I'll get out with any of the dogs tonight, or not. Usually, it's them I'm worried about when it's hot, but I don't necessarily feel like sweating my butt off tonight either. You can see in this photo that they have all followed me downstairs where it's cooler, something they don't commonly do.
I don't know if I'll keep up with regular posting here, or on the NFOA site, once I go back to work. I would probably be more inclined to keep up with the Chief's Corner with whatever time I have to spend. Then again, I don't know what's going to happen when (if) I get back to work. I sure couldn't do my entire job without considerable help the way things are with my wrist right now.
It's a bit warm today compared to what it has been lately. I don't know if I'll get out with any of the dogs tonight, or not. Usually, it's them I'm worried about when it's hot, but I don't necessarily feel like sweating my butt off tonight either. You can see in this photo that they have all followed me downstairs where it's cooler, something they don't commonly do.
Thursday, July 23, 2009
And that's the way it is (in honor of Walter)
I posted an open letter to NFOA members on their forum pages today. I'd be surprised if I don't get a few critical remarks to it, but I felt strongly about the subject and basically thought it was my duty to mention it to what was basically my target audience, gun owners. The idea would apply to anyone who desires to express an opinion, especially on a controversial subject. In this, case, people with a goal to enhance and protect our second amendment rights.
For years, I've followed pretty much any story, article, blog, or forum I happened across that had to do with firearms, the second amendment, concealed carry, gun control, etc. I've written my own letters to the editor, guest columns, comments to on line articles, and posts to various forums, not to mention this and a couple of other blogs. Though I can't say I've never quoted an overused cliche or used a somewhat profane or vulgar euphemism, I generally try to rely on a more traditional debate style of writing. To me logic, comparisons, analogies, hypotheticals, common sense, and an occasional appeal to emotion do far more to win people to one's point of view than name calling, taunting, ridicule, and taking an extreme position simply to antagonize the other side.
I'm often embarrassed by the comments I see from other pro-gunners trying to impress upon the world how absolutely right they are in their position. Sure, I feel a lot of the same emotions. I get a charge out of using phrases with the words "... cold, dead, finger..." or "... only outlaws will have guns" or "an armed society..." blah, blah, blah. I often wonder where the anti-gunners came up with some of the seemingly stupid ideas they have, or how they can possibly believe some of their proposed gun-control could ever accomplish what they hope it will. And, some of the comments from the anti-gun crowd are probably just as embarrassing for their side. They have their own misguided soles who like nothing better than to irritate the "gun nuts" with their own name calling and gibberish. It's probably a good thing I'm reading their comments rather than debating face to face, given that I'd probably be armed and would have a much more difficult time controlling my temper in the heat of the moment than when I have time to sit and reflect on what's really happening.
But, I digress. The point is that when pro-gunners (or anyone) can't write a complete, grammatically correct sentence that expresses a logical, pragmatic idea, they are not likely to convince anyone that they know what they're talking about or that they have a valid perspective on an issue. It's one thing to talk macho and joke around with your buddies and peers who you know feel the same as you do. It's quite another to expect people on the other side of an issue to take you seriously when you can't spell simple words, write a complete sentence, or come up with a logical explanation of your point.
I've already repeated a lot of the things I say in the letter, but if you still want to read it, just click here: http://www.nebraskafirepower.com/forum/index.php?topic=1003.msg6883#new
It will be interesting to see what kind of comments I get on it.
For years, I've followed pretty much any story, article, blog, or forum I happened across that had to do with firearms, the second amendment, concealed carry, gun control, etc. I've written my own letters to the editor, guest columns, comments to on line articles, and posts to various forums, not to mention this and a couple of other blogs. Though I can't say I've never quoted an overused cliche or used a somewhat profane or vulgar euphemism, I generally try to rely on a more traditional debate style of writing. To me logic, comparisons, analogies, hypotheticals, common sense, and an occasional appeal to emotion do far more to win people to one's point of view than name calling, taunting, ridicule, and taking an extreme position simply to antagonize the other side.
I'm often embarrassed by the comments I see from other pro-gunners trying to impress upon the world how absolutely right they are in their position. Sure, I feel a lot of the same emotions. I get a charge out of using phrases with the words "... cold, dead, finger..." or "... only outlaws will have guns" or "an armed society..." blah, blah, blah. I often wonder where the anti-gunners came up with some of the seemingly stupid ideas they have, or how they can possibly believe some of their proposed gun-control could ever accomplish what they hope it will. And, some of the comments from the anti-gun crowd are probably just as embarrassing for their side. They have their own misguided soles who like nothing better than to irritate the "gun nuts" with their own name calling and gibberish. It's probably a good thing I'm reading their comments rather than debating face to face, given that I'd probably be armed and would have a much more difficult time controlling my temper in the heat of the moment than when I have time to sit and reflect on what's really happening.
But, I digress. The point is that when pro-gunners (or anyone) can't write a complete, grammatically correct sentence that expresses a logical, pragmatic idea, they are not likely to convince anyone that they know what they're talking about or that they have a valid perspective on an issue. It's one thing to talk macho and joke around with your buddies and peers who you know feel the same as you do. It's quite another to expect people on the other side of an issue to take you seriously when you can't spell simple words, write a complete sentence, or come up with a logical explanation of your point.
I've already repeated a lot of the things I say in the letter, but if you still want to read it, just click here: http://www.nebraskafirepower.com/forum/index.php?topic=1003.msg6883#new
It will be interesting to see what kind of comments I get on it.
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Something to Do
This NFOA thing is just what I needed to keep my mind occupied while I (hopefully) recuperate from my wrist surgery. Being off work was very nice for the first couple of weeks. Since then, it is a struggle to find something to do (something I can do) to pass the time. I have lots of projects I'd like to work on, but I find I either simply can't do it, or the pain is more than I want to bear.
I haven't found too many "gun nuts"on the site that simply have a macho "I-can-kill-you-if-I-want-t0" attitude. Actually, I've only come across one person who seems a bit too angry for someone who carries a gun. I won't mention any names, especially since it is only my impression taken from what I read of his comments. Maybe the guy just likes to talk tough because he thinks he'll make more friends that way on a "macho" site like NFOA. (I know there are women members too. Don't get your panties in a bind!)
I took the dogs out to Branched Oak today for a swim. Unfortunately, there were some other people there who had a couple of dogs running loose, too. That isn't necessarily bad, but I felt guilty bringing mine down to the base of the damn when I saw them quickly put their dogs on a rope to keep them away from us. So, I didn't stay too long. I figured they came there for the same reason I did, and they were there first, so I shouldn't make them feel pressured to keep their dogs tethered. (I'm not even sure if that is required or not, but obviously they only did it to avoid any unpleasant conflicts between their dogs and mine.)
The dogs had fun for a little while, but I didn't get much excercise. I had planned to walk along the beach and the damn for a while. I guess I'll end up walking them around the neighborhood again tonight (not nearly as pleasant as walking the beach).
It seems I have a few people who have come to check out my blog since I started commenting on the Chief's corner and NFOA. I feel obligated now to post a little more often, even though I don't know if they'll ever be back. I did come across an interesting blog similar to mine (in content if not frequency of posting) by checking out the profiles of some of the other NFOA members. If you're reading this and thinking it is interesting, check out this one: http://joemerchant24.blogspot.com/
I haven't found too many "gun nuts"on the site that simply have a macho "I-can-kill-you-if-I-want-t0" attitude. Actually, I've only come across one person who seems a bit too angry for someone who carries a gun. I won't mention any names, especially since it is only my impression taken from what I read of his comments. Maybe the guy just likes to talk tough because he thinks he'll make more friends that way on a "macho" site like NFOA. (I know there are women members too. Don't get your panties in a bind!)
I took the dogs out to Branched Oak today for a swim. Unfortunately, there were some other people there who had a couple of dogs running loose, too. That isn't necessarily bad, but I felt guilty bringing mine down to the base of the damn when I saw them quickly put their dogs on a rope to keep them away from us. So, I didn't stay too long. I figured they came there for the same reason I did, and they were there first, so I shouldn't make them feel pressured to keep their dogs tethered. (I'm not even sure if that is required or not, but obviously they only did it to avoid any unpleasant conflicts between their dogs and mine.)
The dogs had fun for a little while, but I didn't get much excercise. I had planned to walk along the beach and the damn for a while. I guess I'll end up walking them around the neighborhood again tonight (not nearly as pleasant as walking the beach).
It seems I have a few people who have come to check out my blog since I started commenting on the Chief's corner and NFOA. I feel obligated now to post a little more often, even though I don't know if they'll ever be back. I did come across an interesting blog similar to mine (in content if not frequency of posting) by checking out the profiles of some of the other NFOA members. If you're reading this and thinking it is interesting, check out this one: http://joemerchant24.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
TESTING 1,2,3
Friday, July 10, 2009
NFOA
The cast is off, but sometimes I wish it were back on again. They told me it would be sore and painful (isn't that the same thing?) for up to a year after the surgery. They also said I'd lose some flexibility and strength in my grip. Can you spell u-n-d-e-r-s-t-a-t-e-m-e-n-t? I have almost no flexibility yet, and I can't hold on to much more than a beer bottle (thank God for that).
Fortunately, shooting is a little easier, though nowhere near what I could do before the surgery. The pain is not constant; it only hurts when I need to do something with both hands, and at other odd and infrequent times. I'll give it a few more months, but I'm doubting it will get much better strength, flexibility, or grip-wise. Hopefully the pain will go away altogether.
I joined the NFOA (Nebraska Firearms Owners Association) after coming across their website while trying to find some info on the proposal for a castle law in Nebraska submitted by Senator Christensen. I don't know how much good the organization does, or how active it is, but any voice in opposition to ridiculous anti-gun laws is better than none. Well, I take that back. I've heard some pro-gun ranters who embarrassed the Hell out of me and did nothing more than to make the anti-gunners even more sure that gun owners are a bunch of crazy fools.
I read some posts by a few of their members, and they seem to be firmly pro-gun without the extremist, name-calling, taunting often heard from the (truly nuts) gun nuts. I'll stick with them for a while at least and perhaps even contribute to their cause if it seems they are taking any action that might really bring change (like a castle law that makes sense).
Fortunately, shooting is a little easier, though nowhere near what I could do before the surgery. The pain is not constant; it only hurts when I need to do something with both hands, and at other odd and infrequent times. I'll give it a few more months, but I'm doubting it will get much better strength, flexibility, or grip-wise. Hopefully the pain will go away altogether.
I joined the NFOA (Nebraska Firearms Owners Association) after coming across their website while trying to find some info on the proposal for a castle law in Nebraska submitted by Senator Christensen. I don't know how much good the organization does, or how active it is, but any voice in opposition to ridiculous anti-gun laws is better than none. Well, I take that back. I've heard some pro-gun ranters who embarrassed the Hell out of me and did nothing more than to make the anti-gunners even more sure that gun owners are a bunch of crazy fools.
I read some posts by a few of their members, and they seem to be firmly pro-gun without the extremist, name-calling, taunting often heard from the (truly nuts) gun nuts. I'll stick with them for a while at least and perhaps even contribute to their cause if it seems they are taking any action that might really bring change (like a castle law that makes sense).
Friday, June 19, 2009
CAST OFF
I'm counting down the hours now 'til I get this damned cast off my wrist. I can still manage to do most of the things I need to do, but some of the fun things, like shooting, are difficult at best. Also, it tends to drive me crazy sometimes when it feels like it is crushing my arm. Ninety is the magic number right now.
If it would stop raining, I'd go out to the range again and shoot my 50 cal using a bench rest to steady my aim. I was disappointed to find out that the Ikes no longer hold bowling pin shoots and don't allow 50 calibers to be used in their pistol matches.
If it would stop raining, I'd go out to the range again and shoot my 50 cal using a bench rest to steady my aim. I was disappointed to find out that the Ikes no longer hold bowling pin shoots and don't allow 50 calibers to be used in their pistol matches.
Monday, June 15, 2009
Range of Vision
I've got my new glasses now, so anyone who thought I might be visually impaired enough they could rob me without getting shot better think again. The truth is, my gun shoots better than I can see anyway. I went to the range yesterday to see if my old Remington .22 was still sighted in properly. It was off a couple inches to the right at 25 yards, so I made some adjustments and got some nice three-shot patterns after that. The last group of three actually appeared like one single shot.
Then, I moved the targets down to the 50-yard range and tried again. At that range, I could barely make out the bullseye and couldn't even tell the surrounding circle was bright yellow in color. Still, after firing three rounds, I checked through the spotting scope, and all three were completely within the bullseye.
Being off work because of surgery on my wrist (proximal row carpectomy) has given me lots of time to go to the range for practice. You really do get better the more you do something (well, most things anyway).
Then, I moved the targets down to the 50-yard range and tried again. At that range, I could barely make out the bullseye and couldn't even tell the surrounding circle was bright yellow in color. Still, after firing three rounds, I checked through the spotting scope, and all three were completely within the bullseye.
Being off work because of surgery on my wrist (proximal row carpectomy) has given me lots of time to go to the range for practice. You really do get better the more you do something (well, most things anyway).
Saturday, June 13, 2009
It's About Time
There was some good news on the legislative front recently when it was announced that Nebraska legislator Mark Christensen was looking into the possibility of a so called castle bill for the state. That would put a lot of us gun toters at ease knowing we would no longer face criminal charges or civil actions for simply standing our ground to defend ourselves, our families, our property, or other innocent civilians being attacked by criminals or vicious animals.
I honestly don't know for sure what would happen here in Lincoln if one were to use a firearm to defend against an attacker of some kind. I'm pretty sure they would avoid prosecution on criminal charges as long as they legally owned/carried the gun. Still, I'd be surprised if they didn't need to hire a lawyer to keep from going to court over it, or to get an innocent verdict if they were prosecuted. At the very least, they would be violating the ordinance prohibiting the firing of guns in the city limits.
I hope someday that Nebraskans will realize that our state constitution gives us the right to bear arms and defend ourselves, family, and property without "infringements" of these rights by any state or local authority.
I honestly don't know for sure what would happen here in Lincoln if one were to use a firearm to defend against an attacker of some kind. I'm pretty sure they would avoid prosecution on criminal charges as long as they legally owned/carried the gun. Still, I'd be surprised if they didn't need to hire a lawyer to keep from going to court over it, or to get an innocent verdict if they were prosecuted. At the very least, they would be violating the ordinance prohibiting the firing of guns in the city limits.
I hope someday that Nebraskans will realize that our state constitution gives us the right to bear arms and defend ourselves, family, and property without "infringements" of these rights by any state or local authority.
Saturday, March 21, 2009
A Man's Home is His Dog House
It seems good ol' Lincoln, NE, is not quite the peaceful mid western city it once was. After forty plus burglaries, at least a couple of sexual assaults on store clerks, and a home-invasion robbery/beating in just a couple of weeks, people are starting to wonder about their safety. While I'm not terribly concerned about a break in while I'm at home (with three dogs and a number of loaded guns at hand), I would be rather upset to come home and find my place had been ransacked.
While concealed carry is not an issue in this regard, a castle law would be an improvement Nebraska could make to help insure that innocent citizens can protect themselves without worry of prosecution or civil suits. Current law here is difficult to decipher at best, and leaves a lot to interpretation. In my estimation, deadly force would be justified as self-defense in most cases of illegal entry for the purpose of robbery, burglary, or any type of assault. However, it would behoove one to know the letter of the law in order to make sure one's story of what happened is not only consistent with the evidence, but also that it doesn't violate any of the many stipulations in the statutes. (Don't blow the guy's head off before he gets the back door pried open and then claim he was pulling a butcher knife from your kitchen drawer when you shot him.)
It's hard to know what one would do placed in a situation like that, but I'd like to think that if I discovered intruders in my home, they'd have about two seconds to drop spread eagle on the floor and wait quietly without moving for the police to show up and haul them off to jail. Otherwise, they wouldn't be leaving in the same condition as when they entered, and they might even wake up on the wrong side of the grass in the morning. If by chance, I came out on the wrong end of a gun battle or a subsequent court case, so be it. At least I tried to do the right thing.
While concealed carry is not an issue in this regard, a castle law would be an improvement Nebraska could make to help insure that innocent citizens can protect themselves without worry of prosecution or civil suits. Current law here is difficult to decipher at best, and leaves a lot to interpretation. In my estimation, deadly force would be justified as self-defense in most cases of illegal entry for the purpose of robbery, burglary, or any type of assault. However, it would behoove one to know the letter of the law in order to make sure one's story of what happened is not only consistent with the evidence, but also that it doesn't violate any of the many stipulations in the statutes. (Don't blow the guy's head off before he gets the back door pried open and then claim he was pulling a butcher knife from your kitchen drawer when you shot him.)
It's hard to know what one would do placed in a situation like that, but I'd like to think that if I discovered intruders in my home, they'd have about two seconds to drop spread eagle on the floor and wait quietly without moving for the police to show up and haul them off to jail. Otherwise, they wouldn't be leaving in the same condition as when they entered, and they might even wake up on the wrong side of the grass in the morning. If by chance, I came out on the wrong end of a gun battle or a subsequent court case, so be it. At least I tried to do the right thing.
Saturday, February 21, 2009
There's a new sheriff in town
The gun department the local sporting goods store (Scheel's) is still a hoppin' place. Every time I've been there since Obama was elected, the place has been pretty well packed. At the same time, the ammo shelves have been anything but. They are finally getting some stock in, but still not up to the pre-Obama levels. They still seem to have quite a few guns, but certain types are far less prevalent (AR-type rifles and some semi-auto pistols for example). While I'm not really a collector (I buy my guns to shoot), I still consider them somewhat of an investment. I guess in that regard, this is a good thing as the value of my firearms is probably going up along with the prices on new ones (and ammo). Still, for someone who likes to shoot, the ammo scarcity is unfortunate.The Nebraska legislature was supposed to have a committee hearing on LB503 yesterday, but I haven't gotten any news on what happened with it. This was a bill titled the Nebraska Shooting Range Protection Act (or something along those lines), and was intended to protect established shooting ranges from the encroachment of civilization (and government action) that might result in their being forced out of existence. The NRA lawyers helped write the bill along the same lines as similar laws in most other states, and I hope it passes. I can't afford to drive much further than I already do to find a place to shoot safely and legally.
I hope anyone and everyone who owns a gun, or simply believes in the right to own and carry firearms will vote accordingly and keep in touch with their legislators to let them know we are watching.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
New Holsters
One of my new holsters came a couple of days ago (two if you count the magazine holster). The quality was great, as I expected from previous purchases of the same brand. However, the paddle part of holster had a plastic piece that was designed to keep the holster from coming out when the gun is drawn. I realize you don't want your holster coming out of your pants with the gun when you need it. However, the idea of a paddle holster is that you don't have to remove your belt to put it on or take it off. I had quite a difficult time even putting it on, and I practically had to take my pants off to remove the damn thing. The magazine holster was nearly as bad. I used my bench grinder to "modify" the retainer piece and got them to the point where I could eventually take them off without removing my belt. However, it was still more of a chore than unfastening my belt and pulling it out of a couple of pants loops to get my belt holster off.
So, I went to the garage and "manufactured" my own retainer piece that was rounded such that it was fairly easy to put on or take off again. I was quite proud of myself for doing such fine work. Then, I put it on and went for a dog walk. On the approach to my lot on the return trip, I decided to make a "test" draw of my 45 to see how it worked. Unzipped my jacket, swept it back with my free hand, drew the weapon, and ... had a holster still attached to it. Now, keep in mind the holster is practically brand new and not really broken in yet. And, thinking it wouldn't be a problem, I didn't concern myself with flexing my stomach muscles so as to make my belt tighter as I drew. Hopefully, as the holster breaks in and I remember to flex, it will work fine. Otherwise, I may have to put the other retainer back and live with it, or just keep using my belt holster instead.
So, I went to the garage and "manufactured" my own retainer piece that was rounded such that it was fairly easy to put on or take off again. I was quite proud of myself for doing such fine work. Then, I put it on and went for a dog walk. On the approach to my lot on the return trip, I decided to make a "test" draw of my 45 to see how it worked. Unzipped my jacket, swept it back with my free hand, drew the weapon, and ... had a holster still attached to it. Now, keep in mind the holster is practically brand new and not really broken in yet. And, thinking it wouldn't be a problem, I didn't concern myself with flexing my stomach muscles so as to make my belt tighter as I drew. Hopefully, as the holster breaks in and I remember to flex, it will work fine. Otherwise, I may have to put the other retainer back and live with it, or just keep using my belt holster instead.
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Super my...
For anyone waiting to hear how the Superleash worked, the news is not good. I think they should have called it the Stupidleash. It's a six foot lead with a rubberized D-handle on one end and (connected by about 12 pounds of brass swivel hooks and a ring) three 18-inch straps on the other which have an additional 3 pounds of hooks to connect to the dogs' collars. Actually, it's very well made and would probably work fine for Cesar Millan or Victoria Stilwell who's dogs never do anything wrong. For me and my dogs, the thing was a nightmare. Right off the bat, I thought Mocha was going to lose her tail as she was in the middle and the other two dogs tried to trade sides and their 18'' leads each took a wrap around Mocha's tail and pulled in opposite directions. We weren't even off the driveway yet. No matter how I arranged them, the one in the middle wanted to go to the outside. It's short lead would end up under the tail of the "new" middle dog who was then being shoved forward as the other dog tried to get up even with her. If any of them tried to stop and "do their duty", well, just imagine sitting down on the pot and just as you start to go being yanked off of it by a rope around your neck.
My dogs were used to a 25 foot retractable leash that worked great for one dog at a time. Even two dogs on two 25 foot leashes didn't go too badly, and I got rather adept at doing a quick crossover with the handles as the dogs occasionally changed sides. Three of those were nearly impossible, though, hence the idea my wife had of the Superleash as a Valentine's Day present. I had pretty much resigned myself to walking them one at a time until then. The good news is we'll only have to pay a 15% restocking fee and about $20 in postage to send the thing back (which is probably more than it cost in the first place). I'm still thinking of building some kind of small wagon/sled that I can harness them to so they can drag me around all they want. I'll let you know how that goes.
My dogs were used to a 25 foot retractable leash that worked great for one dog at a time. Even two dogs on two 25 foot leashes didn't go too badly, and I got rather adept at doing a quick crossover with the handles as the dogs occasionally changed sides. Three of those were nearly impossible, though, hence the idea my wife had of the Superleash as a Valentine's Day present. I had pretty much resigned myself to walking them one at a time until then. The good news is we'll only have to pay a 15% restocking fee and about $20 in postage to send the thing back (which is probably more than it cost in the first place). I'm still thinking of building some kind of small wagon/sled that I can harness them to so they can drag me around all they want. I'll let you know how that goes.
Slow Sunday
Hunting season is over, and it's not the greatest weather for going to the range for a little target practice. We had about five inches of snow on Friday, and though the streets aren't too bad, it is still only 28 degrees with cloudy skies. I haven't even tried out the Valentine's Day present yet (Superleash). I'm afraid I'd end up as the sled behind a three-dog team since many of the sidewalks haven't been cleared of snow and ice yet. It makes for a rather boring Sunday.
My new paddle holsters didn't arrive either. They are supposed to be here on Monday, but I had expected them yesterday or the day before.
In my last post, I mentioned robberies here in Lincoln. The gas station I go to most often was robbed about a week ago at around 10 p.m. I go there a lot for pop, beer, or snacks; usually two or three times a day. Sometimes I go over there as part of my dog walking route. They used to have a hook on the outside wall where I could fasten the dogs' leashes while I went inside. The hook is gone now. I don't know if they removed it for some reason, or a large dog was too much for it. I had to tie Murphy up to the cage where they keep propane bottle refills when I went there the other night. I chat with some of the regular employees occasionally, but I haven't had a chance to ask them anything about the robbery yet. I'm glad no one was hurt. I feel kind of protective about the place since I go there so often. I've always wondered how I'd respond if someone tried to rob the place while I was there.
My new paddle holsters didn't arrive either. They are supposed to be here on Monday, but I had expected them yesterday or the day before.
In my last post, I mentioned robberies here in Lincoln. The gas station I go to most often was robbed about a week ago at around 10 p.m. I go there a lot for pop, beer, or snacks; usually two or three times a day. Sometimes I go over there as part of my dog walking route. They used to have a hook on the outside wall where I could fasten the dogs' leashes while I went inside. The hook is gone now. I don't know if they removed it for some reason, or a large dog was too much for it. I had to tie Murphy up to the cage where they keep propane bottle refills when I went there the other night. I chat with some of the regular employees occasionally, but I haven't had a chance to ask them anything about the robbery yet. I'm glad no one was hurt. I feel kind of protective about the place since I go there so often. I've always wondered how I'd respond if someone tried to rob the place while I was there.
Saturday, February 14, 2009
In the beginning...
This inaugural post, coming on Valentine's Day, is dedicated to my dogs: Murphy, Sienna, and Mocha. My wife's Valentine's present to me today was a "Superleash" designed so that I could walk all three of them at once without having to employ my limited juggling skills to keep the leashes untangled. At the same time, it will keep one hand free in case I have to use the gift I gave myself, new paddle holsters for my Kimber 45 and my Smith & Wesson Airlite 357 magnum.


For some reason, there is an increasing number of pitbulls along my walking route, some of which are allowed to run free, and all of which can cause one a great deal of concern when in their presence. Don't get me wrong, I don't dislike pitbulls. I'm sure many of them are great dogs when raised properly and by well-intentioned people. However, I think some people get them as part of a "power trip" or because they are afraid and think they will be good protection. In either case, I'd prefer not to be around them, especially when I have my dogs with me. Who knows when their owners might, intentionally or not, lose control of them and what bad things will happen when they do? I sure don't want myself or my dogs to be victimized.
Fortunately, I have a Concealed Firearm Permit(the first one issued in Nebraska), and I am always prepared. Serious dog attacks are rare here in Lincoln, however, even in this small midwestern city, armed robberies are not. A man about my age, walking his dogs, was knocked down and robbed by two young assailants not two blocks from my home just last year. Seldom does a day go by without an armed robbery somewhere in the city. As unlikely as it might be for me to be the victim of one, it won't happen without a battle.
Below are my dogs, and some of my guns:
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)